Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell County, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00646
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Russell County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Eiland v. Russell County District Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Dist. Court, Heath Taylor, The Russell Commission of Russell County Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Eiland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garner v. Russell County, Alabama et al
as 3:2016cv00567
Plaintiff:
Kwame Garner
Defendant:
Russell County, Alabama , City of Phenix City, Alabama , Raymond J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell County, Alabama v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Russell County, Alabama
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Russell County, Alabama v. Hamilton State Bank (CONSENT)
as 3:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Russell County, Alabama
Defendant:
Hamilton State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
