Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Tolbert v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv02064
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Tolbert
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Millan v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv02045
Petitioner:
Oscar Millan
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tuaimalo v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv01948
Petitioner:
Siaosilepele L Tuaimalo and Siaosilepelenise L Tuaimalo
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reyes v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv01817
Petitioner:
Richard R Reyes
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mercer v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv01822
Petitioner:
Desmond Mercer
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv01669
Petitioner:
Kenneth AK Ford
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ronnie Martin v. BOP, et al
as 23-2440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE MARTIN, Holy Prophet known as Ronnie Bo Author of the Holy Trap Scriptures
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, RUSSELL HEISNER, Warden of Metropolitan Correctional Center and others
Holt v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv00975
Petitioner:
Carlos L Holt, III
Respondent:
Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luckenbill v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Steven Luckenbill
Defendant:
Collette Peters and Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phillip Charleston v. William Lothrop, et al
as 22-16918
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP T. CHARLESTON, named Phillip T Charleston - El
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM W. LOTHROP, Warden and RUSSELL HEISNER, Warden, FCI-Tucson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
