Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Russell Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 22-1306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
USA v. Russell Johnson
as 21-2649
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 3:2021cv00322
Petitioner:
Russell Johnson
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Russell Johnson
as 21-1137
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18063
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Russell Johnson
as 20-2501
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv05331
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GREEN et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2019cv00335
Petitioner:
WILLIAM GREGORY, KRIS JOHNSON, RAYMAR PACK and others
Respondent:
MAIL ROOM CLERK, C.O. I KRAMER, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Green et al v. Fitzgerald et al
as 4:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Thomas Todd, James Spruill, Kris Johnson and others
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, Inmate Employment Clerk, Rich Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01269
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
