Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Brown v. Dunn et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, LaToya Strum, State of Alabama, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shook v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv01048
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, Jefferson Dunn, Corizon Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Annalisa Shook and Lisa Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00972
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Alabama Department of Corrections, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Shelena Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. White et al
as 1:2017cv00544
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cole
Defendant:
Cynthia Stewart White, Jefferson Dunn, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Naglich et al
as 5:2017cv01437
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Keith
Defendant:
Ruth Naglich, Robert Hunter, Nakeetsha Dryer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Emma D. Cook and Natalie C. McKenzie
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC , Alabama Department of Corrections , Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Theresa Holley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Kilby Correctional Facility , Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waites v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2014cv02121
Plaintiff:
Miranda Waites
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility , Kim Thomas , Estes Dwayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
