Cases 1 - 10 of 211
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Matthew Rutledge v. Keenan Production Solutions, LLC
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rutledge
Defendant:
Keenan Production Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matthew Rutledge v. Keenan Production Solutions, LLC
as 5:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rutledge
Defendant:
Keenan Production Solutions, LLC and Keenan & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lucas v. Elgan et al
as 2:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Daryll Lucas
Defendant:
Lacinda Elgan, Kimberly Wanker and Mark Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melissa Rutledge et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
Melissa Rutledge and Stanton Rutledge
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., J.W. Marriot Desert Springs Resort and Spa, J.W. Marriott Hotels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Fantel v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia White, Scott Nieman, Dean Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lake v. Bustamonte et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Darius De'mon Lake
Defendant:
A Bustamonte, D. Rutledge and A. Oboyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lake v. Oboyle et al
as 2:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Darius De'mon Lake
Defendant:
A. Oboyle and D. Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Rutledge v. A. Martinez
as 23-15535
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE DARRELL RUTLEDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
A. L. MARTINEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
