Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SINGLETON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10415
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PATRICK RYAN SINGLETON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roseanne Breezley v. Ham Co Bd of Comm., et al
as 16-3345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSEANNE BREEZLEY, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James W. Barton
Defendant - Appellee:
HAMILTON COUNTY/BOARD OF HAMILTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF JIM NEIL, JAMES COULTER, Hamilton County Jail Physician and Medical Director and others
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE, #3-10, any physicians, nurses, hospitals, corporations, health care professionals, correction officers or other entities, that provided deliberately indifferent and/or negligent medical care to James Barton Individually or by and through th
Billiot v. Dyess et al
as 2:2015cv03054
Plaintiff:
Melvin Raymond Billiot
Defendant:
Larry Dyess, Cynthia M. Cimino, Brett Breavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breezley v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Roseanne Breezley
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Hamilton County Board Of Commissioners, Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Billiot v. Beavers et al
as 2:2012cv02946
Plaintiff:
Melvin R Billiot
Defendant:
Brett Beavers, Stephen Sadowski, Billy Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Enid City of et al
as 5:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellerby Cooper
Defendant:
Enid City of, Eric Reddick, Ryan Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Singleton et al v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv00147
Plaintiff:
Leona Jean Singleton, Joel Ryan Singleton, Ryan Tyler Singleton and others
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
