Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Baker v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Hopkins, Melinda Tuggle, Tammy O'Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Di Donato, et al v. John Kapoor, et al
as 19-80135
Defendant:
MICHAEL L. BABICH, ALEC BURLAKOFF, INSYS THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD DI DONATO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and JOHN N. KAPOOR
Plaintiff:
CLARK MILLER
(PC) Green v. Link et al
as 2:2019cv01324
Defendant:
S. Alvis, Thomas Tyler, N. Costa and others
Plaintiff:
Vencil C. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv02170
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Patrick Fourteau, Michael Babich and others
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Soltau v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv01720
Plaintiff:
Jim Soltau
Defendant:
John N Kapoor , Michael Babich, Darryl S Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Di Donato v. Insys Therapeutics Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00302
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated , Michael L Babich , Darryl S Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Di Donato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jamisi Calloway v. Frederic Baker, et al
as 14-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERIC S. BAKER, LEILANIE LASOLA, SCOTT J. DREXEL and others
Li v. Insys Therapeutics Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Hongwei Li
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Michael L Babich and Darryl S Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Larson v. Insys Therapeutics Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01043
Plaintiff:
Derick Larson
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Michael Babich and Darryl S Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
