Cases 21 - 30 of 45
DURU v. KAISER PERMANENTE et al
as 1:2018cv02752
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, ROBERT SCHREINER, HEIDI H. HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ravansari v. Kapoor et al
as 1:2018cv07026
Defendant:
John N. Kapoor, Santosh J. Vetticaden, Patrick Fourteau and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Ravansari
Nominal Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bennett v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv02170
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Patrick Fourteau, Michael Babich and others
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Soltau v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv01720
Plaintiff:
Jim Soltau
Defendant:
John N Kapoor , Michael Babich, Darryl S Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Erdmann v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02225
Plaintiff:
Hans E. Erdmann
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics, Inc. , Santosh J. Vetticaden and Darryl S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Currier v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01954
Plaintiff:
Kayd Currier
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics, Inc. , Santosh J. Vetticaden and Darryl S. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Baker et al v. Prosperity Bank et al
as 5:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Larry S Baker and Larry S Baker DDS Inc
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank , Lee Michael Harrison, Shannon Winsor and others
Counter_claimant:
Lee Michael Harrison
Counter_defendant:
Lee Michael Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Di Donato v. Insys Therapeutics Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00302
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated , Michael L Babich , Darryl S Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Di Donato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
