Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cleveland et al v. D&E Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
William Cleveland and William Jones
Defendant:
D&E Transport, LLC and Craig S Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bergeron v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Jonathan S. Bergeron
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bergeron v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2021cv00361
Petitioner:
Jonathan S. Bergeron
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McBride v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidation Government et al
as 2:2021cv00884
Defendant:
Majors Bergeron, R. Neal, Rhonda Ledet and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney McBride, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Luke, Sr. v. S. Bergeron, et al
as 20-30152
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MIKE, SERGEANT ESCABAR, SERGEANT MARTIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB FAY LUKE, SR.
Verdin v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2019cv12965
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Verdin, Sr.
Defendant:
Nick Daigle, Landon Siglar, Dexter Gaspard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luke v. Bergeron et al
as 2:2019cv11140
Plaintiff:
Jacob Fay Luke, Sr
Defendant:
Karn Becael, Sgt Harris, Jordan Darcey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parfait v. Neal et al
as 2:2017cv02115
Plaintiff:
Frampton Faro Joseph Parfait
Defendant:
Richard Peter Neal, McClaude Triche, Rhonda Ledet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Prack
as 12-2699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Venettozzi, Assistant Director of Special Housing Unit, Albert Prack, Director of Special Housing Unit, Denise Maas, R.N. and others
Tafari v. Prack et al
as 9:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Albert Prack, Donald Venettozzi, Denise Maas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
