Cases 1 - 10 of 20
LABONTE v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS and LISA NESBITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REYES OVALLE et al v. HARRIS BLACKTOPPING, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03591
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN ROSALIO REYES OVALLE, JUAN MARIO REYES OVALLE, LUIS MIGUEL ROQUE OVALLE and others
Defendant:
HARRIS BLACKTOPPING, INC. doing business as HARRIS PAVING, JAMES W HARRIS, JR., HARRY A HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARRIS v. QUAY et al
as 2:2020cv04080
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: MARYLAND and WARDEN QUAY
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS et al v. ABBVIE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02113
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HARRIS and ELAINE HARRIS
Defendant:
ABBVIE, INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. WEAKNECHT et al
as 5:2012cv04056
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC J. WEAKNECHT, FRANK CATALDI and LATSHA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. WEAKNECHT et al
as 5:2012cv03375
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC J. WEAKNECHT, FRANK CATALDI and LATASHA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50956
Plaintiff:
PHILIP S. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49939
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05233
Plaintiff:
BRENDA S. HARRIS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66474
Plaintiff:
LARRY S. HARRIS
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
