Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith
Defendant:
MD Carla Rogers, MHM Centurion, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Warden Christopher Schell, Franklin County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith, Jr. v. Zanic et al
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
George N. Zanic and David G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, Jr. v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Shawn Myers and Mary Beth Shank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Jr. v. Myers
as 1:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawn Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. WALMART STORES EAST, L.P.
as 1:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
PAULINE S. SMITH
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. EAN HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and JESSICA E. SMITH
Defendant:
EAN HOLDINGS, LLC and GREGORY J. POCKL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. colvin
as 3:2016cv01456
Plaintiff:
Kendra S Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
