Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Paule v. Faulkner et al
as 2:2020cv01362
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Theresa Wickham, Michael Minev, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
David Jerry Paule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Jeffrey S Worthy
as 2:2013cv01395
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Worthy
Worthy v. Deal et al
as 2:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Clyde L. Reese, III, Keith Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worthy v. Georgia Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Resources, Mary L. Skelton, Robert Slater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthy v. My Amazing Site Solutions
as 5:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
My Amazing Site Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Worthy v. The State of Georgia et al
as 2:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Ray S. Gordon and Jasper William Harvey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Worthy v. The Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
The Social Security Administration and Department of Immigration and Naturalization
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Worthy v. Georgia Department of Revenue, et al
as 5:2008cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Revenue and Long County Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Worthy v. College Park Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv02957
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
College Park Police Department and Marcus Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
