Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Theodore Medley v. S. Pfitzer, et al
as 22-15218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE BEECH MEDLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
S. PFITZER, Hospital Administrator at CHCF Stockton, individual: and official capacity, YASHODARA RAO, MBBSMHA, PsyD at CHCF Stockton, individual; and official capacity, S. AREF, C.E.O. M.D. Chief Executive Officer at CHCF Stockton, individual; and official capacity and others
(PC) Theodora Medley v. S. Pfitzer et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Theodore Medley
Defendant:
S. Pfitzer, Yashadora Rao, S. Aref and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodora Medley v. S. Pfitzer et al
as 5:2021cv00545
Defendant:
H. Drey, Kathleen Alison, Jane or John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Medley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godoy v. Brown et al
as 4:2018cv06650
Defendant:
Briggs Karl, Dean Borders, E. Whitlock and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Edwin Chick, Donald Shomaker, Donald Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glen D. Collins v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2017cv02343
Defendant:
S. Aref, S. Aref, Dean Borders and others
Plaintiff:
Glen D. Collins
Cooper v. State of California et al
as 3:2015cv05800
Plaintiff:
Victor Wayne Cooper
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) , Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Todd Thacker v. Tim Perez et al
as 5:2015cv00280
Defendant:
S Aref, S Aref, Sandro Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Thacker
Gray v. Cogdell, et al.
as 2:2014cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
B. Cogdell, F. Gardner, D.L. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Tilton et al
as 2:2011cv02103
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
James Tilton, Robert Wong, Matthew Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Aref
as 3:2010cv01082
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
S Aref
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
