Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smarr v. Armor et al
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Smarr
Defendant:
Armor, Harold Clarke, Mack Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar v. FCC Coleman II USP et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jean Erole Oscar and ZB
Defendant:
FCC Coleman II USP, FNU Kasmuke, United States of America and others
Respondent:
FNU Wegner and FNU Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jean E Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Iqbal et al
as 1:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Jeffrey N. Dillman, Tim Dominick, Ather Iqbal and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Iqbal et al
as 7:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Jeffrey N. Dillman, Tim Dominick, Ather Iqbal and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Wang et al
as 7:2020cv00704
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, T. Cobbs, Jeffrey N. Dillman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Walrath et al
as 1:2019cv01596
Defendant:
S. W. Allen, Darrell L. Miller, L. Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks, Jr. v. Clements
as 3:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
Ozelia Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
David S. Clements
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ozelia Hicks, Jr. v. David S. Clement
as 17-6731
Petitioner - Appellant:
OZELIA HICKS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID S. CLEMENTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
