Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Phelan v. Eckert et al
as 6:2011cv06088
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
S. Eckert, J. Berbary and New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelan v. Eckert et al
as 6:2010cv06612
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
S. Eckert and J. Berbary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelan v. Eckert
as 10-1930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant - Appellee:
James Berbary, Superintendent, Collins Coreectional Facility and S. Eckert, Captain, Collins Correctional Facility
Phelan v. Eckert et al
as 6:2010cv06205
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
S. Eckert and James Berbary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelan v. Eckert et al
as 9:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
S. Eckert and James Berbary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECKERT v. CENTRAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00311
Defendant:
CENTRAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. and MARGARET MARY JONES
Plaintiff:
BRENDA S. ECKERT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MILLER v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2009cv04414
Plaintiff:
ANNE CONTE, HAROLD VOJE, CHRISTINE BRADY and others
Defendant:
ZIMMER GmbH, M.D. Franklin Guttman, Galen Hospital Alaska, Inc. d/b/a ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL and others
Interested Party:
Doctors A&B
Petitioner:
James E. Cecchi
In Re:
ZIMMER DUROM HIP CUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
G4 Concept Marketing Inc. et al v. MasterCard International
as 6:2008cv06457
Plaintiff:
G4 Concept Marketing Inc., George C. Cronin, III, Barry S. Eckert and others
Defendant:
MasterCard International
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Farmer v. Buy Owner of South Florida, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv61825
Plaintiff:
Joseph Farmer
Defendant:
Buy Owner of South Florida, Inc., Charles S. Eckert, Sybil A. Eckert and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
