Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kennedy et al v. Schneider Electric et al
as 2:2019cv00238
Plaintiff:
John H Davis and Bennie Kennedy
Defendant:
ATTORNEY DAVID P RADELET, ATTORNEY MARY ANN FUCHS MCLEAN, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC fka SQUARE D COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOWAK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv41545
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. NOWAK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NOWAK v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76646
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. NOWAK
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOWAK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39255
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. NOWAK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
The Estate of Jerry A. Amaro I, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
as 10-16152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE ESTATE OF JERRY A. AMARO III, GERALDINE MONTOYA and STEPHANIE MONTOYA
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF OAKLAND, E. KARSSEBOOM, R. HOLMGREN and others
The Estate of Jerry A. Amaro I, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
as 10-80058
Plaintiff - Respondent:
THE ESTATE OF JERRY A. AMARO III, GERALDINE MONTOYA and STEPHANIE MONTOYA
Defendant - Petitioner:
CITY OF OAKLAND, E. KARSSEBOOM, R. HOLMGREN and others
The Estate of Jerry A. Amaro III et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2009cv01019
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jerry A. Amaro III, Geraldine Montoya and Stephanie Montoya
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Richard Word, Edward Poulson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Harrell et al
as 3:2007cv00892
Plaintiff:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Mary T. Harrell, Mark J. Harrell, James S. Nowak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
