Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wilson v. Post et al
as 8:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Jesse Wilson
Respondent:
Ryan S. Post and Mike Hilgers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 6:2021cv06604
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Piccolo, Hill, S White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, A. Rodriguez, Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wenderlich et al
as 1:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
S. Wenderlich, S. Post and COs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Candelaria v. Higley
as 13-374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Candelaria
Defendant:
Girard P. Monahan, DOCS Deputy Superintendent for Security at Wende, Randall G. Ziolkowski, DOCS Lieutenant, Conrad K. Walter, DOCS Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Laurence J. Higley, G. Monahan, Robert A. Kirkpatrick, DBA Wende Correctional Facility and others
Goodwin v. Napoli et al
as 1:2011cv01032
Plaintiff:
Joshua Goodwin
Defendant:
David Napoli, S. Post, P. Jayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Klamath County Community Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv03097
Petitioner:
Daniel Mike Chavez
Respondent:
Klamath County Community Corrections, Oregon's Post Prison Supervision Parole Board and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Donald Woodruff
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael P Lane, Roger E Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 1:2007cv00365
Plaintiff:
Peter Lopez
Defendant:
Robert Kirkpatrick, W.R. Smith, G. Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
