Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BOYKINS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
S.R.G. CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, (FNU SCOTT) MS. SCOTT, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kayie Wright v. Christopher Rich
as 20-7428
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY SWINK, Program Director of RDU, in individual, official, and supervisory capacities, LONG, [Captain] of S.R.G., in individual, official, and supervisory capacities, JULIA JENKINS, Program Director of RDU, in individual, official, and supervisory capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT, a/k/a Kayie Shaune Wright
HECHING et al v.ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01659
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HECHING , JOSEPH WERFEL , AVRAHAM NEFOUSSI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
HECHING et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2017cv01192
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HECHING , JOSEPH WERFEL , AVRAHAM NEFOUSSI and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Jenkins v. Jane Doe/John Doe Officers et al
as 1:2012cv03038
Plaintiff:
Wendell L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Jane Doe/John Doe Officers, Jane/John Doe Lt., Jane/John Doe Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Jane Doe/John Doe Officers et al
as 1:2012cv03038
Plaintiff:
Wendell L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Jane Doe/John Doe Officers, Jane/John Doe Lt., Jane/John Doe Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens et al v. T. Hall & Agro et al
as 1:2011cv03763
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Pickens, Vladimir Matos, Dishawn Smith and others
Defendant:
T. Hall & Agro, Castro & Webb, Head of S.R.G. Rodriguez & S.R.G. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
