Cases 1 - 10 of 43
K.M. v. United States Center for Safesport, Inc. et al
as 6:2026cv01999
Plaintiff:
K.M.
Defendant:
United States Center for Safesport, Inc., USA Water Polo, Inc. and Scott Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McGaughy v. US Center for SafeSport et al
as 1:2026cv03861
Plaintiff:
Metry McGaughy
Defendant:
US Center for SafeSport and Dana Ehrenkrantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as - Fed. Question - Assault, Libel, Slander
Madden v. United States Center for SafeSport, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03027
Plaintiff:
Frank Madden
Defendant:
United States Center for SafeSport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Griswold et al v. United States Center for Safesport, Inc., The et al
as 1:2026cv01861
Plaintiff:
Robert Griswold
Defendant:
Laura Egbert, United States Center for Safesport, Inc., The and United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. U.S. Center for Safesport
as 26-1124
Petitioner:
JEREMY HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
U.S. CENTER FOR SAFESPORT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heineking v. United States Center for Safesport, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00438
Plaintiff:
Christian Heineking
Defendant:
United States Center for Safesport, Inc. and United States Equestrian Federation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MADDEN v. UNITED STATES CENTER FOR SAFESPORT, INC.
as 9:2026cv80306
Plaintiff:
FRANK MADDEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CENTER FOR SAFESPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rory Dames v. U.S. Center for Safesport
as 26-1216
Plaintiff:
RORY DAMES
Defendant:
U.S. CENTER FOR SAFESPORT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
