Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yankah v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lois Yankah
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Nurse Boyd, Nurse Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Coleman Sample, by Laurie Latham v. Virginia State Police et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Estate of Coleman Sample, by Laurie Latham
Defendant:
Virginia State Police and Larry Holmes
Counter Claimant:
Adam Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mathis v. Joyner et al
as 1:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
NaQuon Mathis
Defendant:
Joyner, Sample, Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Boyd et al
as 3:2021cv00352
Defendant:
Mr. Beaseley, Mr. Sample, Mr. Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Jai Alquan King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siefried v. Sample et al
as 3:2021cv00195
Defendant:
All Medical Health Staff, Mack, Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Seifried
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kramer v. Mack et al
as 1:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Lagrom, Lt. Brown, All Riverside Jail Staff in General and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Eric Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Leabough et al
as 3:2020cv00993
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Lt. Smith, Sgt. Michael Plutro and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sample v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00849
Plaintiff:
Caroll Franklin Sample
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
