Cases 1 - 10 of 121
ALEXANDER v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2024cv00581
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, M. WILLIS, CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TONEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00534
Defendant:
MADISON PASSMORE, ADONIAH MUKONA, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Plaintiff:
ANGUS JAMES TONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LIZ DOE, LESA WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELO REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAWLS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, SAMUEL BYRD, CARLA COAKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
IAN RAWLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MIDDLETON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL BYRD and CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, SAMUEL BYRD, K. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLAKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, SHAWN HOLCOMB, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BYRD et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
CAMPBELL JACOBS and SAMUEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TREADWELL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH and SAMUEL BYRD
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TREADWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant:
SARA BEDWELL, CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
