Cases 91 - 100 of 251
ALLERGAN, INC. v. APOTEX INC et al
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
ALLERGAN, INC.
Defendant:
APOTEX INC. , APOTEX CORP. , SANDOZ, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
APOTEX CORP. , APOTEX INC. and SANDOZ, INC.
Counter_defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2012cv07907
Plaintiff:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC. and Peninsula Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Counter_claimant:
SANDOZ INC.
Counter_defendant:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2012cv07907
Plaintiff:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 1:2012cv07907
Plaintiff:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 1:2012cv08318
Plaintiff:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GMBH
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ACURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. SANDOZ, INC.
as 3:2012cv06784
Plaintiff:
ACURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Acura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
as 1:2012cv01373
Plaintiff:
Acura Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Purdue Pharma LP et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 1:2012cv07582
Plaintiff:
Grunenthal GMBH and Purdue Pharma LP
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 2:2012cv06077
Plaintiff:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MSD INTERNATIONAL GMBH
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Allergan Inc v. Sandoz Inc
as 2:2012cv00500
Plaintiff:
Allergan Inc
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
