Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Absolute Caulking & Waterproofing, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Sarah Daniel
Defendant:
Absolute Caulking & Waterproofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HANSEN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY HANSEN, ALLICE HANSEN, ECH and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Van Noy et al v. Carltons Transport Group, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sarah Danielle Van Noy and Brittney Cohenour
Defendant:
Carltons Transport Group, LLC and Huff Homer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarah Daniels v. A.c. And S. Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82835
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc
Plaintiff:
Sarah Daniels
DANIELS et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84864
Plaintiff:
M.C. DANIELS, M.C. DANIELS, SARAH DANIELS and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DANIELS et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82835
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON et al v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2007cv66402
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER EUGENE COLLATT, MARY BLAYLOCK, VERNELL BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
