Cases 31 - 40 of 43
City of North Charleston v. SC State Ports Authority et al
as 2:2011cv02040
Plaintiff:
City of North Charleston
Defendant:
SC State Ports Authority , SC Department of Commerce , SC Department of Public Railways and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Singleton v. 10 Unidentified US Marshals et al
as 8:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
10 Unidentified US Marshals, SC, State of, NJ, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. 10 Unidentified US Marshals et al
as 2:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
10 Unidentified US Marshals, SC, State of, NJ, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbogast v. Spartanburg County et al
as 7:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Arbogast
Defendant:
Spartanburg County, SC, State of, Trey Goudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hewitt v. SC, State of
as 0:2010cv01594
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hewitt
Respondent:
SC, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frierson v. South Carolina Supreme Court of SC, State of et al
as 4:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Frierson
Defendant:
South Carolina Supreme Court of SC, State of, Common Pleas Court, Attorney General's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ayre v. SC, State of
as 9:2008cv04032
Petitioner:
James Richard Ayre
Respondent:
SC, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parnell v. SC, State of et al
as 2:2008cv03354
Plaintiff:
Christopher Parnell
Defendant:
SC, State of, James Cooper, Philip Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maciorowski v. SC, State of
as 9:2008cv02117
Petitioner:
William Maciorowski
Respondent:
SC, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weigand v. SC, State of
as 9:2008cv02034
Petitioner:
David Weigand
Respondent:
SC, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
