Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00983
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lomont et al v. Hughes et al
as 2:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Ed Lomont and Luis Angulo
Defendant:
Duane Hughes, Steve Schrader, Robert Willison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Clarke v. Waters et al
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Maxine Waters, John Tune, Marsha Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Decker v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Andrew Decker
Defendant:
Shannah Johnson, Jacob Ruiz, City of Redding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Daniel Cohen et al v. Duane Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv08734
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cohen and David Cohen
Defendant:
Duane Hughes
Respondent:
Steve Schrader, Robert Willison, Raymond J. Chess and others
Evan Rafoul et al v. Carl C. Risch et al
as 8:2021cv01612
Plaintiff:
Haitham Rafoul and Nadia Darwish
Defendant:
Carl C. Risch, Stephen Biegun, Catherine Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
