Cases 41 - 47 of 47
United States of America v. International Brotherhood of T
as 10-1024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ed J. Mireles and Paul Roa
Respondent - Appellant:
Charles Crawley
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO, The Commission of La Cosa Nostra, Anthony Salerno, AKA "Fat Tony" and others
Bennett v. Lohden et al
as 3:2010xc00318
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Bennett
Defendant:
Roy L Lohden, Alan J Rubin, Kris Hinckley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Debt Collection Act
SCHURR v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34008
Plaintiff:
WOODROW C. SCHURR
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHURR v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as PAE/2:10-CV-34008
Plaintiff:
SCHURR
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02165
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
United States of America v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al
as 1:1988cv04486
Defendant:
Teamsters Local 710 & John T. Coli, Individually, Joseph W. Morgan, Eugene Boffa, Sr. and others
Interested Party:
Abraham Moreno and Gary Guillory
Petitioner:
Dane Passo, Francis Gillen, Charles M. Carberry and others
Respondent:
Gerald Pauli, Joseph Kouba, Paul Roa and others
Intervenor:
Patrick Flynn, Kevin Wagoner and Larry Alexander
Undetermined:
Teamster Local 710 & John T. Coli, Individually, Frank Radice and Richard W. Mark
Appellant:
Thomas Flaherty and James Deamicis
Amicus Curiae:
Teamsters for a Democratic Union
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
