Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Coad v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv00980
Plaintiff:
Melissa B Coad
Defendant:
Amanda K. Campion, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Schwab Retirement Plan Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Cimarolli v. Administrative Committee of NetJets Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01633
Defendant:
SCHWAB RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES INC, Charles Schwab Bank, Administrative Committee of NetJets Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Michael Dorman v. The Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
as 18-15281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. DORMAN, individually as a participant in the SCHWAB PLAN RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN and on behalf of a class of all those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., SCHWAB RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES, INC. and others
Severson v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
as 3:2017cv00285
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. , The Charles Schwab Corporation , Schwab Retirement Plan Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Severson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
as 4:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Severson, Christopher W. Severson and Michael F. Dorman
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co. Inc, Martha Tuma, C. Dawn Rorig and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Harris v. Lifeway Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention et al
as 3:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
James B. Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Lifeway Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention , Schwab Retirement Plan Services, Inc. and Stacey Rogers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Miller et al v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01827
Plaintiff:
Mark Miller, Mark Miller, Jacqueline Miller and others
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Trust Company, Charles Schwab Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
