Cases 1 - 10 of 1,515
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Michelle Rieg, et al v. Village of Seville, OH
as 24-3337
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RIEG, BRIAN RIEG, SCOTT WANGLER and others
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF SEVILLE, OH
Intervenor:
NEO COMMERCE CENTER LLC
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio v. Barksdale
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ward, III v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
James V. Ward, III
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Joseph Traverso, Damon Pulver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
