Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Tonya Joyner Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, David A. Hubbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Dexter J. Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, David A. Hubbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Fenwick et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Frank P. Scott
Defendant:
L Fenwick and E-trade from Morgan Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whittington v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2019cv05487
Defendant:
Steve Dyson, Brad Marler and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Ashley Scott v. United States of America
as 17-13742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Ashley Scott v. United States of America
as 17-13741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Scott v. McKenna
as 2:2016cv01839
Plaintiff:
Alaric Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Monica McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bakus et al v. Bakus et al
as 3:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Bakus and Cornell Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Ronald C. Bakus, II , Keegan Bakus and Unknown Heirs of Edwin P. Scott, M.D.
Thirdparty_defendant:
John Koskinen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ashley Scott v. U.S. Department of the Treasur, et al
as 14-14649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, IRS and TYRENE SCOTT
TERRY v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
LUE CINDY TERRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEWINE, KIMBERLY COCROFT, ZACH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
