Cases 1 - 10 of 2,485
Sellers v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
as 4:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds and Ofc. FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheelock v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00416
Petitioner:
Scott Ralph Wheelock
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID **TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN**
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Scott
as 24-30219
Petitioner:
Antoine Edwards
Respondent:
Bradley Scott, Tracey Flemming Davillier, Theoplus Kent and others
Battle v. Hinds County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Paul DeAnthony Battle
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Center, Tyree Jones, Hinds County Sheriff Officers and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
