Cases 41 - 50 of 1,256
Scott v. Arizona Bar Association et al
as 2:2023cv02224
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Arizona Bar Association, Arkansas Bar Association and Arizona State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
Angel Scott
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv02177
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Protel #349846 v. Sheffield et al
as 2:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Sebastian W Protel
Defendant:
Scott Sheffield, Andrew Evans, Bryce Myrvang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cohen et al
as 2:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Jones, II and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Bruce Cohen, Suzanne Cohen, Korbin Steiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Peoria Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Garrison Lee Peters
Defendant:
Peoria Police Department, Unknown Wadsworth, A Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primous v. Arizona Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Primous
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Education, Sean Ross and Scott Hinderliter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala D Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strickland v. Action Direct LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01871
Plaintiff:
Tristan Strickland
Defendant:
Action Direct LLC, Redpoint Contracting Holdings LLC, Scott Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
