Cases 1 - 10 of 1,882
Scott v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv11212
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Ward
Arthur v. UNUM Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Arthur
Defendant:
UNUM Insurance Company of America, Blue Cross Blue Sheild of Michigan d/b/a BCBSM and Garber Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Sutton v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Sutton, III
Defendant:
Scott Wriggelsworth, Unknown Party and Glen Cipullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ervin et al
as 2:2024cv10998
Plaintiff:
Scott Williams
Defendant:
Samuel Ervin and Zupa Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ward, III v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
James V. Ward, III
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Joseph Traverso, Damon Pulver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Chappell v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Markeese Chappell
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Scott Wriggelsworth, Ingham County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ouellette v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 2:2024cv10750
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellette
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Warden
McGinnis v. FBOP, et al
as 2:2024cv10712
Petitioner:
Scott Martin McGinnis
Respondent:
FBOP, FCI Elkton and Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
