Cases 1 - 10 of 1,885
VanAgtmael v. Hart, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Vanagtmael
Defendant:
Hart, City of and Rob Splane
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
Scott #895268 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott #895268
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Unknown Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutan v. Cast et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Jon Paul Rutan
Defendant:
Marney Cast, Abe Dane, Brent Leininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv11212
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Ward
Arthur v. UNUM Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Arthur
Defendant:
UNUM Insurance Company of America, Blue Cross Blue Sheild of Michigan d/b/a BCBSM and Garber Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ryan v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10672
Plaintiff:
Sean Ryan and Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bureau of Health Care Services, Heidi Washington and others
Sutton v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Sutton, III
Defendant:
Scott Wriggelsworth, Unknown Party and Glen Cipullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
