Cases 21 - 30 of 1,047
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. Accordius Health at Lynchburg, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Scott
Defendant:
Accordius Health at Lynchburg, LLC and Accordius Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Morris v. USA
as 2:2023cv00690
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Scott v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Joyce Robinson
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., Lilah K. Scott, Inc. and April Benge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Thompson v. Fairfax County Public Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
Girard Thompson
Defendant:
Fairfax County Public Schools, Scott Larson, Merari Zemary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adkins v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Adkins
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
