Cases 21 - 30 of 30
UNDERHILL v. YOUNG, et al
as 1:2015cv01257
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, JABIN COLLINS, ROY DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERHILL v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2015cv01119
Defendant:
D. ALTMAN, KEITH BUTTS, CASEBERE and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLY v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2014cv01337
Defendant:
BOLT, BURDINE, K. BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomes v. Lake County, Illinois et al
as 1:2012cv04439
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miranda
Defendant:
County of Lake, Wayne Hunter, Scott Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLYNN v. STINE et al
as 1:2010cv01209
Defendant:
KEVIN ALFONT, CHARLES BAKER, MICHAEL EVANSON and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH JAMES FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cesario-Mechetner v. Witherspoon et al
as 1:2009cv03326
Plaintiff:
Bridget Cesario-Mechetner
Defendant:
Jennifer Witherspoon, Officer Hansen, Officer Venus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEXTON v. FITCH et al
as 1:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
KELLYLEE A. SEXTON
Defendant:
SCOTT FITCH, LARRY BYNUM, D. PATTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritz v. Lake County, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv05026
Plaintiff:
Robert R Ritz
Defendant:
Lake County, Illinois, Mark C. Curran, Jr., Scott Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CRUZ v. NEW CASTLE CORR FACILITY et al
as 1:2008cv00195
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A. CRUZ
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORR FACILITY, JEFF WRIGLEY, LARRY BYNUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. HANKS et al
as 1:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
TODD BOYCE
Defendant:
CRAIG HANKS, SCOTT FITCH, JOE RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
