Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail, et al
as 16-3336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HARRIS KOBEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY JAIL, (FNU) BUNTING, (FNU) HAGENBUCH and others
Kobel v. Penn, et al
as 16-3337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HARRIS KOBEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER PENN, HIV Specialist/Doctor, Douglas County Jail, FNU SALE, Primary Physician/Douglas County Jail, YVETTE LNU, Nurse, Douglas County Jail and others
Kobel (ID 103958) v. Dunkle et al
as 5:2016cv03227
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Don Dunkle , (fnu) McGovern , Douglas County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03085
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, (fnu) Bunting, (fnu) Hagenbuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Lansing Correctional Facility, et al
as 14-3042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HARRIS KOBEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FNU LNU (1), Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, FNU LNU (2), Deputy Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Kobel (ID 103958) v. Lansing Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2013cv03088
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Lansing Correctional Facility, FNU LNU (1), FNU LNU (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kobel v. Hardman et al
as 2:2012cv04124
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Hardman, John Doe, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Kobel v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 12-1814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon, Missouri Dept. of Corrections and others
Kobel v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2011cv04223
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon, Missouri Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
