Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Peters v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
USA, David Shulkin, Robert A. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Satkiewicz et al
as 3:2016cv50326
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
Kahlia Satkiewicz, Eric Luna, Dwight Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv08029
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peters v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv00382
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
K Butler , Dr Trost and Illinois Department of Corrections' Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv03082
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
K Butler, Dr Trost and Wexford Health Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2016cv00135
Petitioner:
Scott Peter Gabriel
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gallagher et al v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gallagher, John P. Laurange, Scott Peters and others
Defendant:
Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Christopher Kunkle, Maureen A. Bosco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. McHenry County Connections Officers et al
as 1:2015cv07236
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
McHenry County Connections Officers, Ross, Hinsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Petitioner:
ANDREW SCOTT PETERS
Respondent:
GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ketchum v. Peters et al
as 3:2011cv00112
Petitioner:
Thomas Lowell Ketchum, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Peters and Gerald Clemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
