Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bowen Engineering Corporation v. Pacific Indemnity Co.,et al.
as 4:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Defendant:
Pacific Indemnity Co. and SCOTT PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC.
Cross_claimant:
SCOTT PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC. and Pacific Indemnity Co.
Third_party_defendant:
WALTERS METAL FABRICATION, INC.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
SCOTT PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC. and Pacific Indemnity Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott Process System, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2014cv02613
Plaintiff:
Scott Process System, Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland and Inabensa USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen Engineering Corporation v. Pacific Indemnity Co.,et al.
as 6:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Bowen Engineering Corporation
Defendant:
Pacific Indemnity Co. , Scott Process Systems, Inc. and Walters Metal Fabrication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott Process System, Inc. v. Abengoa, S.A.
as 5:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
Scott Process System, Inc.
Defendant:
Abengoa, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Babcock Power Environmental, Inc. v. Scott Process Systems, Inc.
as 1:2008mc00102
Plaintiff:
Babcock Power Environmental, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Process Systems, Inc.
Babcock Power Environmental Inc. v. Scott Process Systems, Inc.
as 4:2008cv40127
Plaintiff:
Babcock Power Environmental Inc. and Babcock Power Environmental Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Process Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Scott Process Systems, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service Authority
as 4:2008mc40002
Petitioner:
Scott Process Systems, Inc.
Respondent:
South Carolina Public Service Authority
Babcock Power Environmental Inc. v. Scott Process Systems, Inc.
as 4:2008mc00047
Plaintiff:
Babcock Power Environmental Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Process Systems, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
