Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Gomez v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Gomez
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis City Justice Center Administration, Correctional Officer Unknown Moton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurr v. Weber
as 4:2023cv00826
Petitioner:
Jakob Hurr
Respondent:
Scott Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jeremy Pearson v. Frank Gittemeier, et al
as 23-1823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Bradley Pearson
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Gittemeier and Charles Peeper
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dean Minor and Scott Weber
Davis v. Weber
as 4:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Bryce Davis
Respondent:
Scott Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soliben v. Weber et al
as 2:2021cv04163
Plaintiff:
Ricarte Soliben
Defendant:
Scott Weber, Kyle Groll, Mr. Cee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38434
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WEBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irizarry et al v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2021cv01490
Defendant:
Lee Ingersoll, City and County of Denver, Regional Transportation District (RTD) and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Shockley and Abade Irizarry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grace-Bey v. Sims et al
as 2:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
William Grace-Bey
Defendant:
Ryan Crews, Dean Minor, Stanley Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avdeef v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Patrick W. Powers, Judge Don Cosby and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Avdeef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Ross v. Scott Weber
as 21-1480
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eddie Ross
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Weber, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
