Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Burkman v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 3:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
David W. Burkman
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Michael D. Carvajal, Kevin Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ACOSTA v. DALMASI, MD et al
as 2:2022cv04593
Plaintiff:
OMAR ACOSTA
Defendant:
ODEIDA DALMASI, MD, RAEPH LAUGHINGWELL, MD, SANDRA WEST, O.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Rocmon SandersIn re: Rocmon Sanders
as 22-1428
Petitioner:
In re: ROCMON L. SANDERS
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER, WARDEN, FDC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Keith Gant v. Sean Marler, et al
as 22-1396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH GANT
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN MARLER, Warden, MRS. KNOX, A.W., MARISSA NASH and others
THOMAS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv04473
Petitioner:
DARRON THOMAS
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER, DEPUTY WARDEN LAWRY and FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VINES v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv01792
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, SEAN MARLER, ALEXIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. VINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01397
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN PETE LAWRIE, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
VACHO SHAHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLANDING v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv01115
Defendant:
UNKOWN BOP CORRECTION OFFICERS EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNKNOWN BUEAU OF PRISONS MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL BLANDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLER v. SOGO et al
as 2:2020cv04445
Defendant:
A. SOGO, SEAN MARLER, LIEUTENANT CASTILLO and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLMAN v. MARLER et al
as 2:2020cv04101
Defendant:
SEAN MARLER, RAEPH LAUGHINGWELL, ELIZABETH SHERNECKE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. TILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
