Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bradford et al v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 3:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
Yue Bradford and Donald Robert Bradford, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Haller v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 22-3054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. Daniel Haller and Long Island Surgical PLLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, United States Office of Personnel Management, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201 and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Physicians Advocacy Institute and others
Bagnall v. Becerra
as 23-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Michael Savage, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 23-701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sharon Wood, Medicare Representative for Storm Wood (now deceased)
Defendant / Appellee:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
DiCarlo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Ashley DiCarlo
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Public Health and Welfare HHS
Bagnall v. Becerra
as 20-1642
Intervenor:
Jessie Ruschmann, Representitive of the Estate of Frederick Ruschmann, Louis Dziadzia, Loretta Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, George Renshaw, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Mary Smith, Representative of the Estate of Martha Leyanna and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Sarah Mulcahy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellee:
Brenda Hardy, Executrix of the Estate of Loretta Jackson and Michael Holt, Executor of the Estate of Charles Holt
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, AARP Foundation, National Disability Rights Network and others
Pfizer, Inc. v. United States Department of He
as 21-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General and others
Petitioner:
National Minority Quality Forum and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2021cv00475
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, currently Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Homeland Security, currently identified as Peter T. Gaynor in an acting capacity, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, currently Dr. Ben Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Ark of Freedom Alliance, American Atheists, Hindu American Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 5:2019cv01122
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Sharon Wood
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Doe v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 19-1052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Baby Doe and Jane Doe, individually and as Parent/Guardian of Baby Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Robert Calif, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drug (a division of HHS), United States of America, Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Julie Gerberding, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
