Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Hatten v. Elkin et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Arlene F. Hatten
Defendant:
Tom Elkin, John Hinton, Davis Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Steele v. Community Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Galen Steele
Defendant:
Community Loan Servicing, LLC, Selene Finance, LP and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as RightPath Servicing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zupp v. Selene Finance LP
as 4:2021cv02299
Plaintiff:
Gary Zupp
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gills v. Selene Finance LP
as 2:2020cv02125
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Joyce Gills
Poynter v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 1:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP and OWS REMIC Trust 2013-1
Plaintiff:
Eric Poynter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gurkin et al v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 2:2019cv02340
Plaintiff:
George R. Gurkin and Cynthia S. Gurkin
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP and Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gurkin et al v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 2:2019cv02339
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Plaintiff:
George Gurkin and Cynthia Gurkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKenzie et al v. Selene Finance LP
as 3:2018cv13436
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP
Plaintiff:
Kelly McKenzie and Thomas Joseph McKenzie, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Poynter v. Selene Finance, LP et al
as 1:2018cv00650
Defendant:
OWS REMIC Trust 2013-1, SENECA MORTGAGE SERVICING, LLC, SELENE FINANCE, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Poynter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
