Cases 11 - 20 of 357
USA v. $8000.00 in United States Currency From Eight United States Postal Service Money Orders
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$8000.00 in United States Currency From Eight United States Postal Service Money Orders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. $389,820.00 in United States Currency, et al
as 23-10376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
$389,820.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, $15,780.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 4,550.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Williams v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv20296
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
United States Secret Service, U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorneys Office, Miami, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
United States of America v. $271,087.88 in U.S. Currency Seized from Bank of Saipan Account No. Ending in Last Four Digits 0157, Held in the Name of "MCS", et al.
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$271,087.88 in U.S. Currency Seized from Bank of Saipan Account No. Ending in Last Four Digits 0157, Held in the Name of "MCS" and $39,188.38 in U.S. Currency Seized from Bank of Saipan Account No. Ending in Last Four Digits 2098, Held in the Name of "MCS"
Claimant:
Marianas Consultancy Services, LLC and Alfred Yue
United States of America v. $4,815,369.94
as 1:2022cv04946
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$4,815,369.94, 365 Wellness LLC, 5 Star Nutrition LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
Claimant:
Nina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Giscombe v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
M. A. Giscombe
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United States of America v. $124,576.57 In United States Currency Formerly On Deposit In JP Morgan Chase Account 828115775, Held In The Name Of Tingley Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07079
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$124,576.57 In United States Currency Formerly On Deposit In JP Morgan Chase Account 828115775, Held In The Name Of Tingley Systems, Inc., JP Morgan Cashiers Check 9551009098 In The Amount of $412,000, Made Payable To Feliciano Appraisal Services, $320,000 in United States Currency Representing The Funds Associated With JP Morgan Cashiers Check 9551009099, Made Payable To Smile Dental Lab LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Miller Pharmacy Services L L C v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 3:2022cv02424
Petitioner:
Miller Pharmacy Services L L C doing business as Prescription Shoppe Pharmacy
Defendant:
U S Drug Enforcement Administration and Anne Milgram
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. 15 Pit Bull-Type Dogs presently in the custody of the United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
15 Pit Bull-Type Dogs presently in the custody of the United States Marshals Service, Rabbit presently in the custody of the United States through the Summit County Humane Society and All Offspring of the 15 Pit Bull-Type dogs and rabbit; including, but not limited to, four (4) puppies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
