Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DAVIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv00573
Defendant:
PATRICK DUGAN, JOEL JOHNSON, GERALD MAY and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2018cv03177
Defendant:
JAMES KEENEY and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
MARIO TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JIM KENNY, MIRANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv02787
Petitioner:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER COURTS, SETH R. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ENGLISH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv06480
Petitioner:
JAMES F. ENGLISH, III
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NASH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv06387
Petitioner:
JAMEICE NASH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEANS v. ECKARD et al
as 2:2015cv02310
Petitioner:
SCOTT RANDALL MEANS
Respondent:
J. ECKARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH R. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUHAMMAD v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2014cv04817
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
RENDELL, CORBITT, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOUROVELIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04687
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOS SOUROVELIS , DOILA WELCH and NORYS HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL A. NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUNDY v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv06081
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MUNDY
Defendant:
JOHN KERESTES and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
