Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wade v. United States of America
as 5:2025cv00101
Plaintiff:
Wesley Shane Wade
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRANDT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12203
Plaintiff:
SHANE WADE BRANDT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TIMSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13790
Plaintiff:
SHANE WADE TIMSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05210
Plaintiff:
SHANE WADE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHANDLER v. WADE et al
as 1:2019cv02167
Defendant:
ANDREA WADE, MARION UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION INC. and SHANE WADE
Plaintiff:
CHRIS CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SUTTON v. MARION UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION INC. et al
as 1:2018cv04003
Defendant:
ANDREA WADE, MARION UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION INC. and SHANE WADE
Plaintiff:
CHRIS SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wade v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00803
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shane Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018md02846
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline R Currey, Gerald Lane, Abraham Furleiter and others
Interested Party:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wade v. Davol, Inc. et al
as TXS/4:18-cv-01112
Plaintiff:
Shane Wade
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
