Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SHARMA v. ACCUTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
NIVEDITA SHARMA
Defendant:
ACCUTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Patel v. The United States et al
as 3:2021cv00628
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel and The Excellent Raj K Patel
Defendant:
The United States, The President of the United States, Joe R Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. VERMANI TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01484
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILSON
Defendant:
VERMANI TRUCKING, INC. and SHARMA PULKIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RACKEMANN v. CARTER, JR. et al
as 2:2018cv00346
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, REGINA ROBINSON, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RACKEMANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RACKEMANN v. CARTER et al
as 2:2018cv00232
Defendant:
DAVE BHANAT, DICK BROWN, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RACKEMANN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Sharma et al
as 3:2016cv00834
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Rinky Sharma , Bobby Singh , Skyexpress Travel Plaza Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Atcha v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Irfan Atcha
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Indiana Professional License Agency, Indiana State Board of Dentistry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
