Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Fear of God, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03785
Plaintiff:
Fear of God, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Anhui Qiyu Trading Co., Ltd., Anhui Yichun Garment Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
GUANGZHOU SHIMA DECORATION MATERIALS CO., LTD v. SHENZHEN RUIMINGXIANG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD ET AL
as 1:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Guangzhou Shima Decoration Materials Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Shenzhen Ruimingxiang Technolog Co., Ltd, Shi Lei and SHENZHEN RUIMINGXIANG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
AirTourist Holdings, LLC, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 18-71148
:
In re: AIRTOURIST HOLDINGS, LLC, JASON CHEN and EDGAR PARK
Petitioner:
AIRTOURIST HOLDINGS, LLC, JASON CHEN and EDGAR PARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
HNA GROUP CO., LTD, HNA GROUP (INTERNATIONAL) CO., LTD., HNA CAPITAL LTD. and others
Chen v. Lei
as 3:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
Jason Chen
Defendant:
Shi Lei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AirTourist Holdings, LLC et al v. HNA Group et al
as 3:2017cv04989
Plaintiff:
AirTourist Holdings, LLC , Jason Chen and Edgar Park
Defendant:
HNA Group , HNA Group (International) Co., LTD. , HNA Capital LTD. and others
Appellee:
Patriek Karayil , Ho Yen Dong and Jason Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lan v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00138
Petitioner:
Shi Lei Lan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Shi Lan
as 11-50881
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHI LEI LAN, also known as Li Young, also known as Young Chen, also known as Danny Lan, also known as Denny Lan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
