Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DK Fab Inc v Shinn & Son Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
DK Fab Inc
Defendant:
Shinn & Son Inc and Satus Creek Farms LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shinn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv01020
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jennifer June Shinn
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Padilla et al v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2018cv00928
Plaintiff:
Yolany Padilla , Ibis Guzman , Blanca Orantes and others
Defendant:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Department of Homeland Security, US Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinn vs Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jennifer June Shinn
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holcomb v. Burnett et al
as 3:2014cv05087
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Holcomb
Defendant:
Charles Burnett, Jennifer Minkler, Grays Harbor County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust v. A&H Mechanical Inc et al
as 2:2010mc00058
Plaintiff:
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust
Defendant:
A&H Mechanical Inc
Garnishee:
Shinn Mechanical Inc
Shinn v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv01786
Plaintiff:
Dana W Shinn
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shinn v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv05062
Plaintiff:
Peggi Shinn
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wayne v. Davido et al
as 3:2007cv05098
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne
Defendant:
Davido, David R Kendrick, Jennifer Sowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
