Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Martin v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00499
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: John Hamm, John Crow, C. Apiri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silas Martin v. John Hamm, et al
as 26-11688
Plaintiff: SILAS MARTIN
Defendant: JOHN Q. HAMM, individual and official capacity, JOHN CROW, individual and official capacity, C. APIRI, individual and official capacity and others
Silas Martin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 26-11198
Plaintiff: SILAS MARTIN
Defendant: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN CROW, C. APIRI, in individual capacity and others
Martin v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv00259
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: John Hamm, John Crow, C. Apiri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Union Supply
as 2:2026cv00103
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Union Supply
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv00104
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: John Hamm, John Crow, C. Apiri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Yes Care LLC (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00672
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Yes Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silas Martin v. Warden, Kilby Correctional Facility
as 24-13852
Respondent: WARDEN, KILBY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: SILAS MARTIN
Martin v. Borowics (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00697
Defendant: Dr. Borowics
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?