Cases 41 - 50 of 1,048
Simpson v. Brandon et al
as 4:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Richard Bryan Simpson
Defendant:
Thomas S. Brandon, Jr., Robert A Simon, Rebecca K. Eaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burke v. Lopez et al
as 4:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Officer Lopez, Deputy Wolf, Sergeant Betancourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Brent Thompson, Jessie Bellamy, Krystle Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Deshan Spivey
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Brent Thompson, James Lablanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Krystle Simon, Ricky Kennon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghoreishi v. HomeGoods, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Enrica Ghoreishi and Enrica Simone Ghoreishi
Defendant:
HomeGoods, Inc., TJX Companies doing business as TJ Maxx and Marmaxx Operating Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
